Dollars & Cents

Another excerpt taken from the following article:

New Study: Ron Paul is the only candidate who would cut spending
By James W. Harris
American Chronicle

....In fact, Paul´s proposals would cut the bloated federal budget by a whopping $150 billion.

The rest of the candidates might as well adopt the old hit song "Big Spender" ("Hey, big spender!") as their campaign theme.

The other Republicans strut around the campaign circuit, describing themselves as "fiscal conservatives" and boasting about cutting back government.

But the NTUF exposes them for what they are: advocates of an even bigger, even more bloated, even more intrusive federal government than we have today.

* John McCain´s proposals would result in a $6.9 billion spending hike.
* Mitt Romney´s programs would result in a $19.5 billion spending hike.
* Mike Huckabee´s proposals would result in a $54.2 billion spending hike.

As for the Democrats:

* Hillary Clinton´s proposals would result in a $218.2 billion spending hike.
* Barack Obama´s proposals would result in a $287.0 billion spending hike.

Ron Paul Visits Denver!!

I wish I was there!

RON PAUL 2008

I am kind of surprised that the Denver Post actually ran a decent article for Ron Paul, especially since they just endorsed one of the Republican war-mongers.

PLEASE, Vote for Who You Align With, not Who You Think Will Win..

Here is a great RON PAUL article. Sums up everything about him.

Quick Tidbits:
* Ron Paul has never voted to raise taxes.
* Ron Paul has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
* Ron Paul has never voted to raise congressional pay.
* Ron Paul has never taken a government-paid junket.

And in a remarkable show of personal integrity:

* Paul does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
* Paul returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.

AMERICAN CHRONICLE
New Study: Ron Paul is the only candidate who would cut spending
James W. Harris